Flock Cameras and Privacy

Edward Boumendil calls for immediate public oversight and strong limits on access, retention, and sharing of Flock camera data in Desert Hot Springs.

Edward Boumendil standing beside a Desert Hot Springs roadway near an automated license plate reader camera

In brief

Twenty-six Flock cameras were installed throughout Desert Hot Springs without a City Council vote or public discussion. That needs to be corrected.

The issue should be placed on a council agenda immediately. Council members must publicly state where they stand and establish clear rules governing the system’s use.

As a former engineer at General Motors working on Automated Driving System and self driving technologies, I understand how data-sharing systems operate, how information can be misused, and what safeguards the council should demand.

Flock cameras raise significant privacy concerns, particularly when information is shared through regional, statewide, or national networks. From what I have seen, adequate protections are not currently in place.

If Desert Hot Springs continues using Flock cameras, access must be limited to legitimate local law-enforcement purposes, with strong rules governing data access, retention, and sharing.

As a councilmember, I would not have dodged the mass surveillance issue. I’d have demanded a vote.

Sources

Read the underlying material.

  1. Cameras, Crime and PrivacyDesert Local News · July 21, 2026
  2. License plate readers in Desert Hot Springs, CAFinding Flock · September 2026
  3. Flock announces changes amid backlash over its license plate reader networkAssociated Press · August 13, 2026